What Is an Ontology and How Is It Used?

An ontology is a formal, machine-understandable representation of knowledge within a specific domain. It defines a shared vocabulary for entities (or "concepts") and the relationships between them. Think of it as the blueprint for how information is organized, linked, and interpreted, forming the foundation for semantic understanding in both human and artificial intelligence systems.

Ontology development is a critical pillar of any modern, data-driven system. This structured framework enables semantic search, AI reasoning, and interoperability across systems, allowing disparate data sets to be aligned and interpreted coherently. It turns fragmented information into a unified, connected knowledge environment.

When executed effectively, an ontology brings clarity and consistency to complex domains. It allows organizations to formalize how data is related, which in turn enhances understanding, decision-making, and automation. But building a good ontology is not easy.

Too often, organizations spend months or even years designing ontologies only to discover they don’t work in practice. They may be overly rigid, too generic, or not grounded in operational realities. Worse, the slow pace of development means that by the time the ontology is deployed, it is already outdated or misaligned with evolving mission needs.

In today’s world, the organizations that win are not just those with the most data, but those who can structure it meaningfully, quickly, and at scale. A well-crafted ontology is not just an abstract knowledge model. It is a strategic asset that drives interoperability, fuels intelligent systems, and enables faster, more informed decisions.

‍

Why Ontologies are Hard to Develop

Ontology development is notoriously difficult. It is a complex, iterative, and often time-intensive process that can take months or even years to refine. One of the biggest challenges organizations face is deceptively simple: where to begin.

Engineers frequently struggle to build an ontology from scratch. While they may have technical expertise in data structures and system architecture, they often lack the nuanced domain knowledge necessary to model real-world concepts accurately. On the other hand, subject matter experts (SMEs) bring deep understanding of operational language, workflows, and terminology but typically lack the formal training needed to represent that knowledge within rigorous frameworks such as the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), Common Core Ontology (CCO), or Canonical Controlled Vocabularies (CCV).

This disconnect between technical capability and domain insight creates a bottleneck. Collaboration between SMEs and engineers becomes critical, but it is rarely seamless. SME smay describe what they know in plain language, while engineers require structured logic, entity relationships, and defined classes. The result is often a prolonged back and forth where progress stalls and clarity is elusive.

To make matters worse, teams are often confronted with two fundamental and compounding obstacles:

Starting from raw, unstructured data without a clear methodology to extract concepts and relationships necessary for ontology definition

Trying to force-fit operational data into rigid, predefined ontological frameworks, which may not align with real-world needs or use cases.

‍

Both approaches come with pitfalls. Starting from scratch leads to ambiguity and reinvention. Starting from an existing standard can lead to brittle or overly abstract models thatfail to support operational goals. In either case, organizations risk ending up with an ontology that is either too vague to be useful or too rigid to be adaptable.

What makes ontologies hard is not just their technical complexity, but their inherently interdisciplinary nature. Building a successful ontology requires shared language between machines and humans, between data and decision-makers. It demands tools, processes, and platforms that can bridge this gap, not just to design ontologies faster,but to ensure they are useful, maintainable, and aligned with evolving mission requirements.

‍

A Better Way Forward

To make ontology development viable at operational speed, we must fundamentally shift how we approach it. Traditional, linear methods are too slow, too rigid, and toodisconnected from the realities of dynamic mission environments. A more adaptive, collaborative, and automated approach is required. One that balances speed, precision, and human insight.

Here are three key shifts that define a better way forward:

Empower Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) with the Right Tools - SMEs hold the critical domain knowledge needed to define concepts, relationships, and distinctions. Instead of expecting them to learn complex formal languages like OWL or RDF, we must give them intuitive tools that allow them to directly contribute to ontology creation. This shortens feedback loops and ensures that the ontology reflects real-world operations from day one.

Leverage Automation to Accelerate Discovery and Structuring - Machines are exceptional at recognizing patterns across large, complex data sets. Automated systems can ingest raw, unstructured, and multi-modal data to generate candidate ontologies, suggest logical groupings, and surface relationships. Humans remain in the loop to validate, refine, and resolve ambiguities, but automation dramatically reduces the initial time and effort required to build a usable model.

Treat Ontologies as Living, Evolving Artifacts - Ontologies should never be static. They must evolve alongside the missions, systems, and data they support. The most effective teams launch with a minimal viable ontology, validate it in real-world workflows, and iterate based on user feedback and emerging requirements. Continuous improvement replaces perfectionism.

‍

At Aktiver, we have engineered our platform to support this modern approach. Our system uniquely enables the automatic creation, validation, and continuous refinement of taxonomies and ontologies from raw, disparate, and multi-modal data sources. With human-in-the-loop tools that enable SME-driven validation and refinement, teams can rapidly transform raw data and operational insight into functional ontologies and Canonical Controlled Vocabularies (CCVs), achieving results in a fraction of the time required by traditional methods.

We believe ontology development should be fast, accurate, and mission-aligned, not a bottleneck. If your organization has experienced the cost of slow, mismatched, or overengineered ontologies, we would love to show you a better path forward.